CPRE - THE HERTFORDSHIRE SOCIETY
PLOTLANDS: THE
SUB-DIVISION OF RURAL LAND
Have you bought, or are you tempted to buy, a small
plot of formerly agricultural land in the countryside in the hope that it may some
day be granted planning permission for development? Do you realise that these sites are being marketed at around
twenty times their value as agricultural land1, without planning
permission for development or even the prospect of planning permission being
granted in the foreseeable future, if ever?
Article 4 Directions
Are you aware that, once the local Council has put
an Article 4 Direction on the land, removing permitted development rights, you
will not be able to erect fencing, gates or walls or any other minor
development on the site without applying for planning permission (which would
almost certainly be refused)? In other
words, you won’t be able to do anything on the land; except either stand or sit
on it for a short period, or cultivate it.
Destruction of the
countryside
Does it matter to you that, by buying one of these
plots of land, you are contributing to the destruction of the English
countryside? Whole fields are being
taken out of agricultural use, divided up into small plots using stakes and
wire, and then left to grow weeds. If left unchecked, these weeds will develop
into scrubland and eventually, by the process of natural succession, into
low-grade woodland. Alternatively, if the unwanted vegetation is removed,
usually by chemical means, the land is left looking like a desert. Very often,
in order to divide the land into plots and provide access for the buyers,
hedges are removed and trees chopped down, thus destroying some of the features
that made the area attractive in the first place.
Green Belt policy
The land speculation companies selling the plots
claim that the Government’s declared intention to see more homes built in the
South East of England means that the plotland sites will eventually be
developed. This is misleading. Most of the sites are in the designated Green
Belt where very restrictive planning policies apply2. Green Belt
policy is one of the most enduring planning policies and one which the majority
of people in the country support. Government recognition of this was shown by
the Deputy Prime Minister’s assurance that Green Belt land in every Region in
England would be maintained or increased3.
Where the land is not in Green Belt, but is
greenfield (undeveloped) land, it will fall foul of the Government’s housing policy
in PPG3 which states that previously-developed land should be used before
greenfield sites4. The Government target is for 60% of new housing
to be provided on previously-developed (“brownfield”) land or through
conversion of existing buildings. This target has already been achieved
nationally.
The claim is also made that land is a finite
resource, no new land is being made, and therefore it is bound to increase in
value rapidly. Again, this is misleading. Although the total net supply of land
may not change significantly, land for building is recyclable and can be used
again and again. This is precisely what is meant by re-using
previously-developed land and buildings.
Examples of planning
permission being refused
There are already examples of planning permission
on plotland sites being refused by the local Council. This has happened in East
Hertfordshire District, where the Council turned down applications for houses
on five adjacent plots at Hay Lane, Braughing5, and in St Albans
District, where the Council refused an application for housing on a plot at
Kimpton Bottom6.
Government awareness
The Government is aware of the problem of the
sub-division of rural land into small plots for sale, and is considering
possible measures for dealing with it. In April 2004, the Office of the Deputy
Prime Minister sent a letter to the Chief Planning Officers of all local
planning authorities in England reminding them of the potential remedies
already available7. Among the remedies suggested are: the use of
Article 4 Directions to remove permitted development rights; the use of
Discontinuance Orders under Section 102 of the Town and Country Planning Act
1990; the use of Section 215 powers to make good the loss of public amenity by
requiring owners to remedy the condition of land; and the use of compulsory
purchase powers to bring the land into public ownership. The Government is
discussing with local planning authorities how existing measures can be
strengthened and what new measures should be introduced to deal with the
consequences of the creation of plotlands.
NOTES
1
Agricultural land is worth about £2,500 to £3,000 an acre. Plotland
sites are being marketed at the equivalent of £60,000 or more an acre.
2 Under Planning
Policy Guidance Note 2 (PPG2), the construction of new buildings in the Green
Belt is inappropriate development, except for certain limited purposes, and
should not be given planning permission, unless very special circumstances
exist for making an exception.
3 John
Prescott’s statement in the House of Commons on 5 February 2003 about the Sustainable Communities Plan.
4 Planning
Policy Guidance Note 3 (PPG3) March 2000, paragraph 32: “In
determining the order in which sites … should be developed, the presumption
will be that previously-developed sites (or buildings for re-use or conversion)
should be developed before greenfield sites”.
5 Planning applications 3/03/1415 and
3/03/1863-1866, East Hertfordshire District Council, November 2003.
6 Planning
application 5/04/0141, St Albans City & District Council, March 2004.
7 The Sale of Rural Plots and the Planning Consequences: letter dated 19 April 2004 from John Stambollouian, Head of Planning Development Control Division, ODPM. http://www.odpm.gov.uk/stellent/groups/odpm_control/documents/contentservertemplate/odpm_index.hcst?n=2167&l=1http://www.odpm.gov.uk/stellent/groups/odpm_control/documents/contentservertemplate/odpm_index.hcst?n=2167&l=1
August 2004
|
CPRE—The Hertfordshire Society 31a Church Street Welwyn Herts AL6 9LW |
Phone: 01438
717587 Fax: 01438 714984 Email:office@cpreherts.org.uk |